Mainstreaming Anti-colonial Discourse on Palestine: Mohammed El-Kurd’s Discursive Interventions
نویسندگان
چکیده
Palestinian activists have long maintained that the hegemonic discourse used to describe their predicament is unhelpful for understanding nature of so-called “conflict” in country. They maintain a discursive hegemony suppresses voices and denies lived experience. A high-profile case settler organization’s attempt evict families from homes Jerusalem brought visibility counter-hegemonic challenges dominant framing situation Palestine/Israel. Through steadfast on-the-ground resistance was powerfully documented online, attention an otherwise routine act home dispos-session. This study examines advanced by one victims as example growing tendency frame Israeli actions through prism settler-colonialism. The article outlines fundamentals this traces synergies between narratives injustice those system-critical social movements concerned with issues racism, militarism, capitalism examine how power-resistance discourses challenge extant modes knowledge production.
منابع مشابه
A linguistic and discursive view on climate change discourse
Avertissement Le contenu de ce site relève de la législation française sur la propriété intellectuelle et est la propriété exclusive de l'éditeur. Les œuvres figurant sur ce site peuvent être consultées et reproduites sur un support papier ou numérique sous réserve qu'elles soient strictement réservées à un usage soit personnel, soit scientifique ou pédagogique excluant toute exploitation comme...
متن کاملEdward Said and Michel Foucault: Representation of the Notion of Discourse in Colonial Discourse Theory
Edward Said is regarded as the originator of colonial discourse theory. He deploys Michel Foucault’s notion of discourse to accomplish his project in Orientalism and emphasizes Foucault’s notion of discourse and its relation to power, rendering discourse a carceral system. Although Said explicitly expresses the similarity between Orientalism and Foucault’s discourse theory, it seems he...
متن کاملThe Case of Children’s Literature: colonial or anti-colonial?
Since Jacqueline Rose published The Case of Peter Pan in 1984, scholars in the field of children’s literature have taken up a rhetorical stance which treats child readers as colonised, and children’s books as a colonising site. This article takes issue with Rose’s rhetoric of colonisation and its deployment by scholars, arguing that it is tainted by logical and ethical flaws. Rather, children’s...
متن کاملDisfluency and discursive markers: when prosody and syntax plan discourse
Hesitations, interruptions within phrases or within words are common in spontaneous speech. Those phenomena are widely known to be observable from a prosodic point of view through disfluencies. From a syntactic point of view, many studies already established that discursive markers such as hm, oh, I mean, etc. are representative of spontaneous speech. In this study, we demonstrate through a joi...
متن کاملAnti-Individualism, Content Preservation, and Discursive Justification
Most explorations of the epistemic implications of Semantic AntiIndividualism (SAI) focus on issues of self-knowledge (first-person authority) and/or external-world skepticism. Less explored has been SAI’s implications for the epistemology of reasoning. In this paper I argue that SAI has some nontrivial implications on this score. I bring these out by reflecting on a problem first raised by Bog...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Tripodos
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['1138-3305', '2340-5007']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51698/tripodos.2021.51p49-67